Blog # 1 - How and Why We Must Judge a Righteous Judgment

 Most of us have been trained to be tolerant of everything: good, evil and everything in between, right?  “I’m Okay, You’re Okay!”  “Whatever toots your horn!”  “Judge not that ye be not judged,” Jesus commanded (Matt 7:1).  Are the above statements bits of “wisdom” or just plain foolishness?  Is it good doctrine to refrain from judging as we pass through life?  Aren’t we supposed to discern, evaluate or judge between what is good and what is evil?  It was called the “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil”, wasn’t it?  Why do you think that it was placed in the center position of the Garden? (Gen. 2:17)  Why was that Tree strategically placed on the best and most prominent piece of real estate?  Does that placement have bearing on the rest of holy writ and a large part of the purpose and context of mortality?

Notice, also that one of the first mentioned creative acts of God was to gather the light, and He called it good.  He separated the light from the darkness which was already there. Is God teaching us, from this account, that it is good to divide the light from darkness or the good from evil?  Isn’t that an act of discernment and judgment?  

Is this teaching us that God discerns and judges between good and evil and so to live with Him, and to follow Him we must learn to effectively do that same labor?  With that in mind, would a better translation of Gen. 2:17, be to call it “the Tree of the Knowledge of Good from evil?”  Didn’t God call the light good?  Did He call the evil good?  No, He called it darkness! (Gen. 1:4) Consider: “… becoming as gods, knowing good from evil, placing themselves in a state to act…”  (Al. 12:1) and “… it is given unto you to judge, that ye may know good from evil…”  (Moro. 7:15)

People tell us, “Don’t judge me!  You don’t know me well enough or what I’ve gone through, to judge me fairly!”  But in John 7:24, Jesus directs us to, “Judge not according to appearance [your traditions], but judge righteous judgment.”  So which is it?  Are we to judge or is it none of our business?  The prophet corrected the thought back to its original intent in Matt 7:1 to coincide with John 7:24 to read:  “Judge not unrighteously, that ye be not judged [for judging by anything other than by God's standards?]: but judge righteous judgment.”

Also let’s include into our line of reasoning the fact that intelligence, “or in other words, light and truth … forsake[s] that evil one … that wicked one cometh and taketh away light and truth [the Spirit of God within us] through disobedience … because of the tradition of their fathers.”  (D&C 93:37-39)  Thus God, being the most enlightened, or intelligent of all by far, divides or separates light and truth from darkness or the evil one.  Could we then conclude that, we too, as we increase in our ability to discern or judge between finer and finer shades of evil, that we also are growing in light and truth or become more “intelligent”? 

On the other hand, if we are not increasingly growing in light, and discerning truth from error, more and more effectively, why aren’t we?  The Lord reveals that when we disobey His commandments, even ignorantly, it is called disobedience.  We often judge an unrighteous judgment because we measure with inaccurate models called “traditions of their [our] fathers.” Thereby, the evil one is empowered to suck light and righteousness, or enlightened judgment, out of us.  We then proceed, having been deceived, by being disobedient. Our decision hardens our heart.  Our sensitivity is lessened, and now we begin to  believe a “little lie” or truth mingled with error, obscuring our vision just a bit. In such a manner, an evil spirit attaches to our new personal “creed” most of which we inherit, with strong emotional family-arity, and we have thus just taken another step down the path to being more and more fettered by the chains and handcuffs of hell.  (Study D&C 123:7)

Let’s conclude this blog by beginning to practice judging and categorizing everyday ideas, temptations, sights, and reasons we use to explain why we do what we do.  This is something we adults need to practice every day and it is also an exercise one could teach their children to engage in, to help give them a head start beyond where we may be ourselves today.

Divide every idea we consider, into degrees of intensity of light.  The greatest intensity of light for us on earth is the sun.  The next greatest illumination is the moon and the least intense are the stars on a clear night.  We will let the intensity of the sun represent the highest level in our judging criteria, or denominate it as something pertaining to what is Godly.  The illumination of the moon would represent good, honorable, moral standards possessed by most on this earth.  Lastly consider the relatively low level light from the stars to represent a very low quality of behavioral standard, far removed from the immediate effulgent presence of God.  If you were in a class room you could call the sun as “thumbs up” and the moon level as “thumbs to the side.”  The lowest level would be “thumbs down” and for more advanced participants, an aggressive active motion of thumbs downward could represent something of extreme evil or outer darkness, son of perdition type stuff. 

By what standard we judge will fundamentally determine, in large measure, the potential good of the final reward of our judgments, right?  If we judge by a Godly standard we have a better likelihood of moving closer to God (brightness increasing) by deciding to ingest that food, idea or activity into our lives.  For some that standard would be the Scriptures of whatever origin.  Remember the more accurate the standard, from the Creator’s point of view, the better for making the best judgment possible.  If our version of the Scriptures, or our own personal interpretation of those Scriptures, is mixed with false traditions, we will, of course, only be able to render a partially righteous or accurate judgment, from God’s point of view.

What would be examples of good moon intensity gauges by which to measure?  We could measure by the best philosophies and theories throughout history, or the wisdom amassed by our own family geniuses of which we are heirs. We could Google it and take the idea that best suits our fancy.  We could judge based on our gut level feeling or what our closest friends council us, etc.

The lowest level standard could be what gives them pleasure as opposed to pain.  Thus lying is okay, from their point of view, if it saves them from personal pain.  Good is that which serves them personally, letting others fend for themselves.  This low spiritual frequency exaggerates the needs of the body over the spiritual hunger or sensual pleasures above what is of a more long range and enduring outcome.  I trust you get the idea from living in this world and society.

Let’s start with an easy one:  junk food.  Does eating junk food tend to move one more toward a sun, moon, or stars enlightenment outcome?  Does eating such food move us spiritually and physically more toward God or away from being sensitive to His higher good?   It’s quite easy to judge that one, but perhaps harder to get ourselves to act according to our best judgment, right?  How do you judge it?  GIGO or garbage in, garbage out indicates the fact that if we put garbage into us spiritually, mentally or physically, it does cause certain consequences in our potential degree of being rewarded with a healthy and happy life in this world.   

Now consider the wearing of tight fitting, body form revealing clothing.  When women and even men wear skin tight clothing, what is their purpose, goal, or motivation?  Is it shallowly disguised by saying, "I do it because everybody is doing it or it is the current traditional fashion?"  Could it be that one feels small or unclean, or unworthy inside and wants people to desire to look at their body to make them feel better about theirself?  Is that person wanting to signal that they are available for the best offer of sexual contact?  What percentage of the cases you could dream up would conclude that the wearing of curve revealing clothing leads to the glorious presence of God and more of His Holy Spirit?  How many possible outcomes you could imagine are probably leading towards, honorable, moral purposes and outcomes?  How do you judge it? Does it tend, in most cases, to move one toward the sun, moon or stars level of enlightenment and final judgment? 

This judging a righteous judgment could become hard work, couldn’t it, especially if one’s past choices were less than glowing?  It may, consequently, become harder and harder to discern accurately, and may even impinge on one’s personal daily activities, causing guilt and a desire to cover up what one is thinking or doing as they begin to measure, by a sound standard, what their behavior is at all. 

When a person has begun to compromise against the standard they say they believe, and then life moves them into a situation where they have to judge a person who has made more correct decisions than they, how will they measure that person?  Will they out of guilt tend to put that person down with guarded but envious anger?  Will they judge by the most righteous standard they can measure by?  If I were to judge unrighteously a person more righteous than me, how would my judgment effect my own progression or lack thereof?  One could thus quicken their downward momentum by not only continuing to make bad judgment calls for themselves, but could greatly heap up upon themselves pain upon pain by their unrighteous judgments of others.  Scary business this judgment principle, isn’t it? 

Now let us just pick a couple more examples so you clearly get the pattern down.  How about watching professional sports?  Questions we could ask pertaining to this consideration might be:  Who tends to push professional sports and for what reason?  Are professional sports designed to make a few very rich and to make spectators of the shallow thinking masses?  Are they probably sun, moon or star enlightened people?  Once a habit of watching event after event becomes ingrained, which degree of enlightenment is it pushing one toward?  Do you dare ask the hard questions of yourself especially if this is one of your traditions and enjoyments?  If you don’t want to play the judge a righteous judgment game anymore, toward what intensity of light have you then decided to be content with?

How about why women wear perfume, wear high heel shoes, or why men want a Lexus, or why youth say, “I don’t care what my parents think or if my bedroom is messy.”  In all these things we are making decisions of what to think about, and of course, we are making judgments for our own lives and the effects of our decisions are affecting each of us and those around us forever. 

Bro. Steve


4 responses
The Sins of the Fathers When one would say that he has no memory of the offense, but if he did, he asked for forgiveness (from his victims?) and is satisfied that is sufficient and he has no memory of committing the offenses and no memory of asking for forgiveness, what is the meaning of this? Is this an obtuse way of pleading nolo contendere (“nothing to oppose”). Through it all, the statement accepts no liability whatsoever. How many times did the forgetting occur, and for how many transgressions? If you believe all that, there’s a ranch estate waiting for you on Mars. “Power is never ridiculous.” Napoleon This is a response worthy of the mendacious Clintons. Is such a degree of offense so trivial as to be forgotten? It’s not even an apology. The infamous Pope Innocent III said the pope as Vicar (“another flesh”) of Christ judges all and is judged by no one. Is this what we have become? Is this the gospel as taught and lived by Joseph Smith? Is this how God treated the leaders of the early church as witnessed by the Doctrine and Covenants? How are we spiritually better or better off than the LDS Church? Brigham Young taught more would be damned by the Principle than exalted. The Principle doesn’t damn anybody, it’s the decisions we make while living it or living with it that determine that. Devoutly wishing a thing isn’t so, doesn’t make it not so. Should being in denial of wrong-doing become a contagion among us? “Come out of her my people, lest ye partake of her sins and receive of her plagues.” (Rendition of Rev. 18:4) If we lose the truth by rejecting it, we will become subject to every wind of misunderstood doctrine and lacking the oracles of God, subject to the judgments that are about to be poured out upon this nation. Saving ordinances don’t have power to save without an animating spirit. If we don’t believe in the truth contained in our scriptures, (including respect for and adherence to Divine Law) what good are they to us when the storm breaks? “If the heavens are silent, we should be silent, also.” Of course the heavens are silent. God is waiting for His people to pray for clarity and guidance and exercise discernment and apply the law He has given to restore our bond of blessing as a people. These are perilous times to cast ourselves adrift without the living oracles of God. Our blessings are predicated on obedience to men, but only inasmuch as they are in harmony with God, or in other words, our blessings are predicated on obedience to God above the wishes and interests of men (if it must come to that). St. Thomas Moore put it this way moments before his execution for the sake of truth: “I die the king’s good servant . . . but God’s first.” What would a righteous judge do? I believe he would remind the offender of the privilege and duty of a patriarch to raise up a righteous seed and share in their eventual exaltation, and that is more than just seeing they have blessings and attend meetings and have instruction in the faith. The patriarch’s duty is to protect the testimony as well as the persons of those in his charge while sustaining their commitment to virtue and setting a good example to inspire trust in the word of the Lord and his anointed. I believe a righteous judge would inform me that by committing the first offense while holding an office, “my” priesthood (authority to represent God) was thereby rendered under suspicion or at least incomplete, and that I have forfeited my family and children in the eternities. The most I could expect would be to be a candidate for re-baptism. Under such circumstances I wouldn’t want me to have priesthood and so dishonor God. The Sins of the Fathers A sin is compounded by failing to climb back out through appropriate amendment at the time. As a part of oracular confession, the Catholic priest will ask, “How many times?” [. . . did you forget?] The God-sanctioned remedy for a situation of this kind is stated in the Doctrine & Covenants Section 43:4. Whether it should be invoked in this case is a matter of conscience, consultation by prayer and discernment by all those whose standing before God is even in part depending on sustaining this man. Brother Steve even has a question as to the validity of the office as it now stands, without the matter of conduct. See Blog 6. Fear can’t overcome truth. We have to ask God in prayer about our situation and our course. The dangers of our pre-millennial age require it. Either we will all be in agreement, or we must choose – the strength of our own faith in our communication with God, or rely on others. “. . . For it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!” (Mt. 18:7) What if a man in such a situation were of a mind to genuinely repent, he should make a forthright, thorough, and heartfelt confession to the general body, because in his misdeeds all have been harmed due to loss of the living stream of authority. In so doing, as an act of moral clarity, he should teach the law he has violated together with the provisions and the penalties so that all are clear as to who we are and what we stand for. Second, he should vindicate the accusers and their advocate. Third, he should face the issue of worthiness to hold office.} For what shall it profit a man (or a body of men) if they shall gain the whole world, and lose their own souls? (See Mk. 8:36.) Even the forgiveness of each individual member cannot outweigh the obligation to atone that must follow, or we are nothing more than another church of men, substituting our will and notions of rightness for that of God. Mercy cannot rob justice; it can only be applied after the changing power of the law has been satisfied. You don’t sustain a man in high office out of sympathy. Express compassion in other ways. Priesthood is always serious business because of the eternal consequences of what is at stake. What if a man so situated could not bring himself even to the first step, anymore. In that case, is there no-one among his peers who has sufficient love, respect and fear of God to help him? Has he no true brothers among his peers? Reconciliation with God is not punishment, alienation from God is. The consequence of such sin against God and against the sacred innocence of children, papered over, is like breaking a vacuum-paned door. The first crack is followed by another and the cracks beget cracks until the entire panel is a heap of glass bits on the floor. Among the consequences will be loss of our children, justifying their willfulness by our willingness to tolerate grave sin. “And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.” (Mt. 24:12) “When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto you her strength.” (Gen. 4:12) In human terms this means desertion from within. “Am I my brother’s keeper?” (Gen. 4:9) That was Cain attempting to distance himself from his deed. What is a parent? What is a patriarch? What is a God? Note that neither Cain, nor Judas could repent. Do we sustain any man to further his own damnation? God is not mocked or denied. He will simply withdraw himself as He did with Heber J. Grant, who wailed, “The heavens are as brass to me.” Is this how we wish to be governed, guided and directed? “And upon my own house shall it begin.” (D &C 112:25) What follows, temporally anyway, is simply losing God’s protection and sharing the fate of the world. The Sins of the Fathers In time, with men teaching after the prompting of their own hearts, we shall lose understanding and even the knowledge of many precious truths we have inherited until, if there should be time, succeeding generations would be little better off than the LDS and the Protestants they are trying so carefully to assimilate with. “. . . and your enemies say this house shall never fall. But, verily, I say unto you, that desolation shall come upon this generation as a thief in the night, and this people shall be destroyed and scattered among all nations.” (D&C 45:18,19) We have a foundational and communal disease in the Work and it manifests itself as a lack of love and respect for one-another, and as a result, a lack of love and understanding of God. We place stumbling blocks on each other’s way, requiring extra effort on behalf of everyone to show forth love in the midst of darkness. Spiritual growth is held to a glacial pace, thereby, and we do not know how to seek further. “And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.” (Jn. 1:5) Keeping a ‘pecking order’ based on family ties along with suspicion and devaluing outsiders has a lot to do with the spiritual darkness we retain and the lack of a climate of communal love and trust we endure. We are faced with a scandal and because of a lack of trust and love of long-standing, it found its roots in a long-ago childhood. Because of our fear of the truth, it remains unresolved according to the law of the Priesthood, a law that stands apart from the craftiness of men. This wound in our midst clouds the understanding and judgment of many until it would eclipse the light of truth, itself. Many are afflicted with the social conditioning that requires caution and outright fear, the hallmarks of alienation and separation – from God whose allegiance we profess. The government-craft of men has supplanted the governing principles of the Savior in too many houses and families, as well as in how our affairs are conducted. There is a dimension of leadership that is lacking among us, indicated by the word, “inspired”. The law is integral to our salvation, but it is not sufficient, in itself. Following correct principle is more than adhering to a rule book; the understanding must be quickened, animated by love in the form of respecting and valuing others. God must be included in this valuing. We have to find our place – by our effort to give place to others and to God. We only truly know God by making ourselves to act like Him and do as He would do. We experience a reflection of God’s love in how others respond, or how they give, first. This should reinforce us and strengthen our resolve to endure to the end. The crime of molesting a child is not only a crime against the child, a crime against nature, a crime against society, and a crime against God; it is a crime against love, itself, and our nature as godly spiritual beings. By committing this offense, we wound the soul of the victim and cut ourselves off from knowing what it’s like to love and be loved. “. . . with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you: . . .” (Mk. 4:24) “I never knew you.” (Mt. 7:23) Look into the pit wherein the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saint Church lies. Many of them sustain a man confessed and convicted of habitual pederasty, whose authority is based on the allegiance of men, not the law of God. It is the opinion of many of them that his civil punishment is excessive, a perse-cution, and would forgive him just to have former things restored. His degree of anguish and status of confinement is atonement enough for them. How much different are we from them? For years I prided in us that we do not peddle female flesh the way they do, or would support the unsupportable, but how much do I know? I would be ashamed to try to save someone I love through the ministry of this Work. The Sins of the Fathers Elder Anderson gave a fine speech at Spring Conference 2015 in which he extolled the virtue of knowing not only the steps of the dance, but feeling the music. He said to the effect that children brought up in a regime knowing the forms, but not experiencing the spirit soon lose their enthusiasm, [followed by their allegiance. Others soldier on without conviction, with derailment due to adversity or distraction only a matter of time and circumstance. The gospel has to be administered and exemplified. Children have to share in the joy we should feel in living the gospel. Personal involvement, dialogue, and discipling should be a part of parenting, mentoring, and leading in paths of righteousness]. We are instructed to sustain our leaders, but how do we know that our leaders are God’s leaders? Aside from prayer, we know them by their example of honoring law and upholding equitable justice. When men charged with the responsibility of maintain the ways of God and the purity of His teaching remove themselves from God through unacknowledged, un-atoned and therefore unrepentant sin, the people they preside over are not served, but have a portion in their separation from God. This is a form of damnation, the spirit of truth held back. How many times have we been told that if we are not progressing, we are falling behind, retrogressing? Is being “out of order” an euphemism for sins whose magnitude and extent are monstrous and other departures that approach apostasy? Is it no wonder that we have had no acknowledged revelatory guidance from the Lord for over a generation? One of the very purposes for which the Church was founded and which this Work was calved off is to maintain the oracles of God for His people. God’s presence in our midst is accompanied by signs; His absence as a teacher and revelator and edifier is likewise accompanied by signs to the discerning. Do the meanderings of those who broke up families and attempted to dam up the course of justice in the matter of Joe, George, and Chevrol sound like they were receiving the promptings of the Spirit of Revelation? Lay aside the red-tipped cane; take off the smoked glasses. Be a worthy priesthood. When the LDS church was set on its way to discard one ordinance, in one generation it discarded more. This audience is well-acquainted with the pruning process that continues to this day. Many quietly retained what they had been given and continued in fellowship with the majority for the remainder of their lives. A few valiant souls, retaining the imprint of what they had previously received, refused to accede and struck out on their own painful and perilous journey. The “occupational hazards” of fundamentalism such as sexual appetite, desire for lordship rather than servant-leadership, failure to discern the quality of leaders or defend the sanctity and purity of marriage, and a return to blind following continue to take their toll. Retaining purity of ordinances requires at some point, purity of the participants. Access to ordinances requires a statement by the candidate of worthiness in personal purity and honesty in business dealings. The Egyptian Book of the Dead is a voluminous crib sheet of correct answers to questions of moral probity. The correct answer is not necessarily a truthful answer, but was sufficient for the Egyptians. Is to say and not necessarily to do the standard of our religious intent and practice? Heber J. Grant cut out Priesthood from the ordination of new Elders et al and so it has remained, reinstated by David O. McKay, but unrepaired. Does God validate the sacred work of those who have perjured themselves? Are we in danger of becoming as they are, holier than a Swiss cheese? The Sins of the Fathers “Sin is the kryptonite of priesthood.” “By their fruits, shall ye know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns or figs of thistles?” Jesus Christ (Mt. 7:16) The conclusion I come to in reviewing Bro. Steve’s blog is that the people he indicts, if the charges be true, simply do not believe in the revealed and living God. Instead, we are witnessing a society evolved to uphold the selfishness of men who are free to exploit, nay defile women and children and feed off those they deem to be the lower orders. The sins of one are the sins of all who sustain this. Is there is a group in our midst bound together by mutually sustaining each others’ sins in a cabal of secrecy and fear, a chain gang? Whether many or few, or single, the continued presence of such persons unchecked, is a witness against all those who harbor them. Priesthood requires individual accountability and so the secret sins contaminate all those who even know the secrets and yet tolerate their presence. Under these circumstances the declared enemies of the work are simply content to let the consequences of sin run their course: testimonies weaken and decay, and the members drift away – as they are continuing to do. The jungle weeds of human nature have overgrown what is now the lost “City on a Hill,” and “We have met the enemy and he is us.” Walt Kelly’s Cartoon Strip – Pogo Possum Desanctifying sacred ordinances through unworthiness and iniquitous application (e.g. unlawful adulterous marriage) has no place in the Household of Faith. Is it better to have none at all, than to drink unto ourselves damnation? It seems there are too many of us who are so busy with building up “the kingdom” (whosoever’s kingdom that may be) that we take no awareness that this Work is a cockpit in the struggle of good against evil, a long, drawn-out, grinding struggle like the great carnages of World War I: the battle of the Somme, 1915, or Verdun, 1916, in which men’s lives were expended by the tens of thousands. How many have we lost needlessly because of spiritual and moral injuries inflicted upon them? If we have lost the talent to minister, how many more will be lost that we could have partnered to raise as saviors on Mt. Zion? If the Devil can break us here, he hopes to critically weaken God’s plan of raising the kingdom of heaven in the millennium, soon upon us. Lineages of righteous seed will be dammed up, unable to be tabernacled with their forbears. Every dead lineage is a victory for Satan. God could not spare David. “We shall not lie, cheat, or steal, or tolerate among us those who do.” The foregoing is a typical credo held by cadets at the U.S. Military Academies. It represents unity of purpose and commitment to principle. It is simple and direct. There is no exception for file leaders, or the Lord’s anointed, or any other style or title. “By their fruits shall ye know them.” (Mt. 7:20) What harvest have we brought forth to the Lord in terms of a faithful, valiant posterity? The purpose of this blog is not to destroy the Work, but to prevent the Work from destroying itself. When evil is allowed to bear rule within families or upon the priesthood counsels, it will crater the Spirit of the Lord among us, and for want of that, we are left naked to the will of our enemies and the onrushing tsunami of prophetic events. (Blog 8) The Sins of the Fathers The cry for justice is like the cockpit warning system of an airliner. It cries, “Pull up! Pull up!” not to confuse the pilots, but to call for saving action in a situation of imminent destruction. (Blog 8) Are we governed by the laws of the priesthood with regard to administering justice fairly, with due consideration for two sides in trial, or are we following the model of the Mafia (“my faith”) with its code of obedience (obbedera) to a man in all things and silence (omerta) about the activity of confederates? What does “Holiness to the Lord” mean? What does it mean among us with regard to administering justice? What does it mean in the governance of our families? The Lord has performed the chess move of “castling-the-king” by calling fullness-upholding patriarchs from out of the Church in the 19th century. Must he do so again to rid his saints of the corruption of sexual immorality, cover-up dishonesty, financial inequity and abandonment of open, codified justice? The tighter the fist of tyranny squeezes, the faster the sand runs out. Idolaters make men their gods in place of God, by placing the judgment of men supreme over the principles governing the administration of justice and the duty to lead women and children in righteousness. Christ’s way for us is that of servant-leader, not tyrant. Through Cain came the model of the god-king, accountable to no one and no law other than his own. Idolaters are in love with making the image that all is well with sacrosanct leaders and not preserving the spirit of the living God that accompanies righteous dealing and moral living. Sin un-forsaken is a carbuncle that continues to exude its poison throughout the body. A gesture of repentance without fulfilling the conditions required to make the painful sacrifice and strengthen a change of heart, does not remove the poison and succumbing to the temptation is likely to reoccur at any time. When does it no longer become a matter of petitioning for the right way to be followed by men of redeemable conscience, and when does hardened inequity become a definer and predictor of consequences now that the right way has been refused? “I am Ozimandius, the Great. Look upon me, ye mortals, and despair.” This poem by Lord Byron describes his musing before a great stone image of the pharaoh Rameses II, half buried in sand, the man and his kingdom remembered only in name. The work is in winter with regard to spiritual growth and inspired leadership. Is this a statement of fact of long-standing, or is it mere propaganda from the mind of a spoiler? Is it a call for a return to God’s authority and standard of government, or is it expressive of man’s agenda opposing God’s anointed leaders? Only your own experienced and inspired discernment can tell you. If you do not know your duty, then why are you here? If you refuse your duty, then what are you here for? Is there a landslide covering the mountain road of our eternal progression? What is the nature of the obstacle? When grave sins of child neglect and abuse, perversion of ordinances, and harboring sexual criminals are extant, people will partake of the sacrament unworthily, perjure themselves for access to ordinances, and break their covenants through unclean living. Leadership is responsible to root out these things – no matter in whom they are found. If leadership does not take responsible action, is no one responsible? The Sins of the Fathers Part of the reason why sin is not cleansed among us is in the fruits of inbreeding and nepotism. Doctors and lawyers protect each other. So too, do families. So too, do partakers in perverting the purpose and intent of a God-inspired oath. Where is God here? Is short-sighted pragmatism in self-aggrandizement the governing principle among us today? Narrowly conceived self-preservation characterized the French and Russian monarchies and defined their style of rule. It predicted their end, as well. Those who do not rule themselves for God, but rule for themselves in God’s name are on the same path as the other kingdoms of men, some of which claimed to rule in His name also. Where there exists a dichotomy between righteousness and sinfulness, these poles set up a conflict in which self-destruction will occur where righteousness cannot prevail. Our justice is deaf as well as blind, and don’t forget intoxicated. Bro. Steve’s blog is an array of potshards. Step back and see the picture defined by grouping the colored tiles. See the picture of what we have become through the eyes of God as set down in scripture.
Truth Against the World In his first teaching blog #1 – How and Why We Must Judge a Righteous Judgment, Bro. Steve presents one of the key components for us to forge a path, to break trail ourselves in passing through states and stages of spiritual maturity to achieve the degree of salvation we have become most accustomed to and comfortable with. One limitation a teacher has given our mental powers in this life is that he has to present his messages one at a time, topic by topic. It is all too easy to lose perspective and become discouraged, unless one is well on the way, committed to living the gospel way of life. I model this learning as entering a woodland bordered by fields, as they are in England. In my model, one can enter the woods from any direction and upon many paths, as it’s all the same, but when one is undertaking to consciously assemble one’s faith for the first time (or for the first time, again), some degree of perspective is helpful. The perspective I offer, the aerial view, is that becoming a conscious, participating son or daughter of God and possessing a more full citizenship in His kingdom must begin with your attitude of willingness to make the Holy Spirit a partner with you. All aspects of the gospel, of which judging with righteous judgment is one, support and strengthen the others. They all go together to make a complete God-living soul. Even if it’s like talking to the walls at first, it’s the important beginning from which all the rest is enabled. The process begins by making the prayer for assistance. It helps to declare your intention as best you understand it; that’s the beginning of the commitment, the thing the Holy Spirit needs in order to get to work. Another way to enhance your sense of the Holy Spirit’s communications is to do something good for someone, or to make the prayer before opening the scriptures. I use a mantra, a concept I borrowed from the Hindus: “I trust in God for every good thing.” Having the right attitude opens you and then things begin to happen – wonderful things. The scriptures become less obscure and threatening when you go at them with a purpose, e.g. “I want to know about the Savor’s love and just how he goes about bringing forth the salvation and eternal life of man.” When you put into your mind a “hash tag” or “file flag” of awareness of an area of concern, the answer may come to you from an insight you gain in daily living. The process is like assembling a jigsaw puzzle from the center, adding pieces to the ones you already have. The more pieces you have, the more opportunities you have to add more. This is how one’s confidence in the Lord and yourself as his son or daughter is built. This is how one magnifies one’s calling. This is more than knowing (gaining a testimony), it’s knowing and having done, being able to do. (In my case, I find myself writing all this because a deep concern was brought to me, and Bro. Steve’s blog learnjustice.posthaven.com speaks for itself.) There is no American decency, Christian decency, Mormon decency; it should all be one. Lives get ruined when clever men alter the concept of decency to put others in bondage, as in “communist morality,” or “Nazi morality.” The way of apostasy, moving away (sic) from the Savior’s plan of salvation, lies in adulterating what constitutes right and wrong. The penultimate purpose of the Devil is to disconnect people from their God and the way he does this is to contaminate, skew, alter, and adulterate God’s gospel with perversions that get men alienated from God, misunderstanding God, and serving other men who claim to be on God’s side, or claim to be better saviors than he is. This is why Bro. Steve starts out trying to inspire in you the sense of the need for building up your righteous judgment muscles. The Work is troubled, an even stronger word is presented to me from prayer, and I have undertaken to respect that word and shape my understanding of things here, accordingly. The nature of the problem and the solution must be sought and confirmed to you, only through exercising discernment with the Holy Spirit beside you looking over your shoulder. This is what priesthood is about; this is what priesthood is for – finding the true way in a dark and dreary world infested with lies and distortions. Priesthood finds the way in order to lead others, to minister to them as a servant-leader, not as a lord and master. “Call no man your father upon the earth . . .,” Jesus said. (Mt. 23:9) He said as well, “Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.” (Mt.23:10) “But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.” (Mt. 23:11) (We don’t go around actually calling our leaders father or master; that’s not the point. It’s the attitude with which they behave and how they behave and how we have become to be conditioned by our traditions to regard them -that is the spiritual equivalent of mastership vs. servant-leadership.) The errors we have to detect and put away from ourselves are not confined to false doctrines and bad behavior, but traditions in the way we understand the Lord that fly in the face of scripture and the true men of God raised up in and from our founding generation. “Tyranny is OK, if it’s God’s tyranny,” is an example of an apostate notion that, expressed in other ways, amounts to the same thing: a doctrine of devils. The various attributes of a man or woman of God (of which the ability to discern and make righteous judgments is one) go together and support each other. If you don’t have your bedrock attitude secure, raising up your sense of love for what you recognize as the goodness of God in establishing and administering His plan and involving you with Him, then the various paths become rock strewn and steep. “Ask and it shall be given you; seek and ye shall find; knock and it shall be opened unto you.” (Mt. 7:7) Jesus says this two more times, three times in all. We have it in Luke 11:9 and Rev 3:20, his final sermon to the world whose ancestors we came from. Let’s take him at his word. As Mormons, we have the Abba, Father Privilege, so let’s start thinking that way and approach him with the purpose of allying and aligning ourselves with him and not stand off at a distance hunched over in studied awe. The best way we can show respect for the Lord is to engage with him with the idea being to be like him and do things as he would have them done. Running around censoring yourself all the time to make sure you are exercising righteous judgment soon becomes tiresome and onerous, joyless and discouraging. Obeying and incorporating one of the gospel principles by itself can be like trying to keep to New Year’s resolutions. This is how many people approach the task of transforming themselves, and this is how religions are taught, one piece at a time, and this is why many people add to what they already have (or think they have) and grow in the gospel at a glacial pace while keeping themselves aloof from close communication and cooperation. It’s no fun having to go to the gym every week to be battered and bruised as other fighters have their turns at the pulpit in the ring taking their shots. That’s what it’s like when there’s more presenting from outside as to how you must think and what you must do, and it is not met (or preferably exceeded) by your own effort to seek, know, and do. This religion belongs to you; it has been intended to belong to you from the beginning, but you have to reach for it on your own terms as you align your personhood with that of the Lord. “. . . And, behold, the Lord passed by, and a great and strong wind rent the mountains and brake in pieces the rocks before the Lord; but the Lord was not in the wind: and after the wind an earthquake; but the Lord was not in the earthquake: And after the earthquake a fire; but the Lord was not in the fire: and after the fire a still small voice. (I Kin 19:11, 12) This is the Lord making a point to Elijah to build up his confidence to go forth and act, seemingly alone, to accomplish the Lord’s purpose in an unbelieving world. Building the ability to judge with righteous judgment is a process. You can start by choosing to do what is right in those areas you already know about from your conscience. That’s what Bro. Steve is saying in the paragraphs about choosing the “Puritan way,” above the self-indulgent way. When you are engaged with the Lord in ministry, however muted, and you set yourself to enjoy what you do to brighten another’s day or improve their outlook, carry that fleeting sense of joy over to make a better choice later on. Develop a sense of reward within yourself, and be open to that sense of reward that comes from God in doing things His way. Take time to express gratitude. That’s like taking deep breaths to calm yourself from a sense of lonely struggle to receiving the peace of the Lord. As you continue to explore the learnjustice blog, do so with your own urim and thummim of heightened awareness in affiliation with the Holy Spirit of the Lord and exercise righteous judgment. Some passages will speak louder than others, at first. When a man has a mature overview of the gospel and a wealth of experience having lived by its teachings, truth and error will become obvious to him and he won’t need “the arm of flesh” to tell him right and wrong, good and evil, genuine and counterfeit. In the state of mind of a practicing servant of God, you will very well find yourself in accord with Brigham and John and Joseph Musser on these issues, as well as understanding the Spirit and intent of their and your Lord. Judging with righteous judgment can be likened to learning how to walk up the side of a mountain. Each step is deliberately placed on top of a hummock, not off to one side on the slope. You maintain your balance on each step you have secured before you cast your leg upon the next balance point. The view becomes more expansive as you climb. Each step contributes to your journey and wins elevation as well as distance. Short steps with moderate up lifting accomplish more than stretching or trying to run directly up the slope. The counterfeit notions that become the standards by which we judge have an affect on us to dull our sensitivity and produce around us an aura of negative emotion. Most people are so used to living in this state of malaise they are not aware and see no need to change. As you apply awareness to the choices you make, even choices that have little spiritual weight to them like sliding into daily habits of self-indulgence and stimulation, your sensitivity will increase and you can apply that increased sensitivity to discerning the truth in the big wolf and bear issues that haunt the forest of this work and have the potential to deny the way home to us as assuredly as any of the other sects and creeds, for all our claims to superior knowledge and obedience. Overcome evil or error with something you like better. Learning to appreciate and then enjoy the fruits of right choices is a more sure way to retain them. It’s like singing while pulling the handcart. It takes discernment and a different point-of-view to be aware that there is something gravely amiss. Unhappily, that awareness in the voices of our past, proven prophets and the Lord, himself are only fixed on paper. The living voice anymore has to come directly from the Holy Spirit. A blogster can only point the need to be vigilant and diligent and obedient. “And Jehu the son of Nimshi shalt thou anoint to be king over Israel; and Elisha the son of Shaphat of Abelmeholah shalt thou anoint to be prophet in thy room.” (1 Kin 19:16) This is an example of how the Lord talks to his prophet (Elijah) about a succession. Have we, because we have outgrown the primitive technology of the past, become beyond the active ministration of the Lord? If being like Rulon wasn’t attainable to men, was it because men didn’t attempt to keep themselves in the way and thought they would let the ordinances they had received somehow do it for them? This is not about one set of men vs. another; this is about the Lord handling men representing on the one hand, wheat and on the other, weeds. Resolving the matter of worthiness to represent God and receive his support both for them and for us, must now be a matter between you and the Lord, and not between you and any other man as decider. If this work is to be redeemed, men my attempt to employ the existing structure, but finding the right way is the duty and the privilege of every individual, man and woman, who has reached the age of accountability. The truth may come on you all at once, like the ten commandments came to Moses, or in pieces as you accept them in order to assemble the whole yourself. It may come in both ways, but come it must if you are to continue to be servants, even friends of the Most High. In Julius Caesar’s Gallic Wars, his propaganda “blog” making his credentials to lead and rule in Rome, he describes more than one battle with the obstinate Germans as having reached the triarii. That means the swift and the strong had been overcome and only the last line remained to withstand the fury of the enemy. In our situation, those of you who read this with the purpose to defend truth against the world are the triarii of this Work. If you go down to follow men who claim to be men of God, but don’t behave as men of God, then the hope of Joseph, Brigham and the rest will be lost in you – and in yours. Postscript. This is from memory. “E-bin, e-bir, e-bede,” according to George F. Jowett, author of The Drama of the Lost Disciples, was the credo of the Celtic Druids, or followers of druith, or truth. They preserved a form of Christianity acquired from ministers of the gospel before the time of Christ. It means, “The truth against the world.” (or, “that which is eternal, against the world” A.F.) People want the things of this world, material things: glamor and other consumer bait, because they enhance one’s feeling of wellbeing. The alternative is to become connected by choice, by affiliation, by custom, by preference to things connected to God and godliness. That takes work, and that is the work we are set upon this world to do – to remake ourselves not only in God’s image as He made us, but in God’s mind as He invites us to do. “Evil has no power, unless the good make themselves weak.” The Outer Limits The good make themselves weak by being unloving and untrusting in God, instead trusting in men.
46. First Impressions “And the light shone in the midst of the darkness . . . “ General comments based on impressions from reading Bro. Steve’s blogs 1 through 60 in learnjustice.posthaven.com. Most of these have not been assigned to specific blogs. So Bro. Steve has received his burn notice; that’s what the T.V. show about spies set in Florida calls it. With us, it’s the equivalent of civil near-death. It is our good fortune that we live in this century. If we were in Catholic Spain during the Renaissance how many of us would have been guests of honor at an “auto da fé”? (An “act of faith” was how the Inquisition labeled the burning of a heretic alive in public.) Who will be the standard bearer for the religion – in scholarship and in attitude and in courage? There were dozens of contemporary prophets, but only one Jeremiah. There were dozens of priests of Baal, but only one Elijah. Only Abinadi undertook to stand before King Noah (Mosiah, Chapter 12). I thank God that there is some Christian spirit among us who has added another forum to that of Bro. Steve. A small choice can have big consequences. I have observed that organizations do not reform from within. I think a part of the present state of affairs has an analog in geography. I am thinking of a meadow in the Yellowstone Reservation. A sign says that a raindrop that falls on one side of this meadow will eventually end up in the Pacific Ocean and one falling an infinitesimal degree next to it will join myriads of companions in a journey to the Atlantic (via the Gulf of Mexico, of course). We are like raindrops, but with a spark of volition. From one decision (or relinquishment), in this case how to follow (blindly or responsibly), and then what to follow (law of men or law of God), and now, who to follow flows everything that comes hereafter for us and for those influenced by us until the last syllable of time. For too many families, decisions were made generations ago that will define them now before God. Where does a path or an increasingly consistent pattern of falling away begin? When does a man stop listening to the still, small voice or the promptings of conscience? When does a man separate seeking to become adept with the words of a faith -from seeking to become one with the Author of that faith? When does the power of a cultural climate eclipse the communal sharing of a common faith? In affairs of statecraft and war craft, history gives us many examples of institutional failure when those at the pinnacle of prominence are revealed as having gone their own way for a long time out of view. Blog 1. In gaining light and knowledge, I assume that one should be building a mature, discerning and active conscience, as well. Joseph Smith said that he did not govern men; rather he taught them how to govern themselves. Should his spiritual successors do differently? Are we about control or empowerment of those we lead? (And we are all of us led as well as leaders.) We should be about both in a proportion that honors each. Are the proportions correct with us? Niccolo Machiavelli (16th century Italian diplomat) describes a political world in which governance depends on a populace that more or less adheres to cultural and moral norms. The Prince relies on these ingrained values in his subjects to master them by deliberate systemic violation of their beliefs and perceptions through deception, secrecy and betrayal. Joseph Goebbels, the herald of National Socialism, refined and summarized these strategies in proclaiming the “big lie” as an essential tool of a revolutionary government. First Impressions 2 People are limited by the scale of their perceptive framework. Tell a big enough lie and they won’t recognize it for what it is. Men will steer their perceptions to preserve their peace with things as they are for them. Men will embrace a convenient lie if by so doing they are comfortable. Men will choose to accept a lie into themselves if it conveys an emotional reward rooted in safety for the self. Those in the world’s authority have long relied on this devastating principle laid out in the infamous “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.” It is: “We teach others to believe as truth that which we, ourselves, know to be false.” It is a statement from those who live a lie. Where does this “knowing” come from, but Hell? The evidence in Bro. Stephen’s blogs presents a clear need for awareness that evil exists among us, not only alleged to exist in a principle suspect and a single category of sin (murder of innocence), but on a political level (cover up), and on a doctrinal level (authoritarianism based on men, fostering and men accepting blind following). The radiating spokes of this evil reach into every aspect of our spiritual life and development of our Celestial souls, and, if uncorrected, will deny our hope to return to the welcoming presence of the Father and the Son. (2 Nephi 28:21, 24-26) The ideal that the Lord laid out through Joseph was a hierarchy of responsibility and stewardship with authority over that stewardship, but also accountability. But just as with the Constitution of the United States, priesthood government cannot succeed without its participants being men of honor, integrity and commitment to the ideals of this faith. The priesthood was to be composed of men of the highest virtue, ever striving to perfect themselves. This striving was to make themselves in harmony with the law abiding nature of Jesus, and in harmony with his self-denying nature of servant leader. The two are inseparable, although men would have it otherwise. It is all too easy to lose track of the necessity to assume the virtues of the nature of the Savior and focus on that part of our gospel that declares for building one’s own kingdom in imitation of other patriarchs and holders of higher ordinances. Men tend to gravitate in favor of doing things that can be seen, rather than being good for goodness sake. In a way, the participants in priesthood organization at all levels need the accountability that should come from the church structure. Having the nature of a servant-leader is not achieved by saying that carrying out the functions of a calling fulfills this responsibility. Being a servant leader is an attitude that must characterize everything we do. It is to be a trait of personality. The school of the prophets is also the school of the saviors, or in time the mis-perception will divorce the participants from the mind and Spirit of God. You can't be where He is unless you are like-minded. Everything we do in daily life either strengthens us and makes of us closer in mind and spirit to Jesus, or retards us, or, in the case of sexual exploitation, makes in us a nature that is incompatible with being in the presence of the Savior. Our damnation is of our own doing. When we give an accounting of ourselves, it will be as though our natures and desires were laid open, without the ability to exercise the conceits and deceits the natural man uses. We are either preparing to be comfortable in the presence of one we have strived to be most like and thus know, or one whose penetrating judgment we fear, because we have pursued a path of estrangement and double-mindedness all along. First Impressions 3 I wonder if one of the requirements to be forgiven of gross sin expressed in D&C 132 is to have one’s higher ordinances performed with the approval of the Lord through the manifest sign of his energy upon one. Without that, is the ordinance complete in the fullest sense? Without that, is such a position of great trust valid and in force? Do we have the Lord’s indemnification if we didn’t have his approval to enter into the sacred ordinance in the first place? If this approving power be necessary, it follows that the one performing the ordinance and the one through which such ordinances be performed must be likewise approved by God, by the same sign. Bro. Owen’s surprising confession in (blog 6, p. 6 and blog 31) gives pause. Perhaps it really is a “distinction without a difference” as the LDS Mormons would say. But what if the Lord wants a man not only who is qualified, but has extra strength in virtue or a commitment to the truth, stronger than to be swayed by other men? What if the Lord knows when a man only appears to be qualified, but has some unfinished business? (This refers to those appointed through the sole agency of man to high office.) This is why it is so important that we know of ourselves where our leaders stand with God and have the question of worthiness confirmed, and not merely by hearsay assurances. What is of the Lord cannot be overthrown by man. What is of the Lord cannot be overthrown by truth. This is why the apparently bold assertions against Bro. Steve found in blog 8 are so pathetic. However, men can betray their trust and subvert law and justice and the other attributes of priesthood as upholders and protectors, and do it from within. Whatever man or group of men declare themselves to be above the law, or act above the law, they are thereby setting themselves above the lawgiver. This is blasphemy when the law is given by God and the men claim to hold God’s priesthood authority. Lawlessness is one of the attributes and prerogatives of whom? “And upon my house shall it begin . . . First among those among you, saith the Lord, who have professed to know my name and have not known me, and have blasphemed against me in the midst of my house, saith the Lord.” (D & C 112:25, 26) If there’s one difference between where we are and where a man of God like Rulon is, it’s that when he felt prompted by events, or heard the voice of the Lord, he went forward and pursued the matter to the end. He used the knowledge he had and applied it to doing the work of the Lord. He used the powers of priesthood he had in the correct way, as directed by the Holy Spirit. He took the Lord at his word. Why don’t we? If we’re going to have the power of the priesthood confirmed in us, we have to step up and claim it, and bear the burden of so doing. We all hold the same priesthood; it’s only a question of degree of responsibility and sphere of stewardship. We gain experience so we can be worthy of greater things.
46. First Impressions “And the light shone in the midst of the darkness . . . “ General comments based on impressions from reading Bro. Steve’s blogs 1 through 60 in learnjustice.posthaven.com. Most of these have not been assigned to specific blogs. So Bro. Steve has received his burn notice; that’s what the T.V. show about spies set in Florida calls it. With us, it’s the equivalent of civil near-death. It is our good fortune that we live in this century. If we were in Catholic Spain during the Renaissance how many of us would have been guests of honor at an “auto da fé”? (An “act of faith” was how the Inquisition labeled the burning of a heretic alive in public.) Who will be the standard bearer for the religion – in scholarship and in attitude and in courage? There were dozens of contemporary prophets, but only one Jeremiah. There were dozens of priests of Baal, but only one Elijah. Only Abinadi undertook to stand before King Noah (Mosiah, Chapter 12). I thank God that there is some Christian spirit among us who has added another forum to that of Bro. Steve. A small choice can have big consequences. I have observed that organizations do not reform from within. I think a part of the present state of affairs has an analog in geography. I am thinking of a meadow in the Yellowstone Reservation. A sign says that a raindrop that falls on one side of this meadow will eventually end up in the Pacific Ocean and one falling an infinitesimal degree next to it will join myriads of companions in a journey to the Atlantic (via the Gulf of Mexico, of course). We are like raindrops, but with a spark of volition. From one decision (or relinquishment), in this case how to follow (blindly or responsibly), and then what to follow (law of men or law of God), and now, who to follow flows everything that comes hereafter for us and for those influenced by us until the last syllable of time. For too many families, decisions were made generations ago that will define them now before God. Where does a path or an increasingly consistent pattern of falling away begin? When does a man stop listening to the still, small voice or the promptings of conscience? When does a man separate seeking to become adept with the words of a faith -from seeking to become one with the Author of that faith? When does the power of a cultural climate eclipse the communal sharing of a common faith? In affairs of statecraft and war craft, history gives us many examples of institutional failure when those at the pinnacle of prominence are revealed as having gone their own way for a long time out of view. Blog 1. In gaining light and knowledge, I assume that one should be building a mature, discerning and active conscience, as well. Joseph Smith said that he did not govern men; rather he taught them how to govern themselves. Should his spiritual successors do differently? Are we about control or empowerment of those we lead? (And we are all of us led as well as leaders.) We should be about both in a proportion that honors each. Are the proportions correct with us? Niccolo Machiavelli (16th century Italian diplomat) describes a political world in which governance depends on a populace that more or less adheres to cultural and moral norms. The Prince relies on these ingrained values in his subjects to master them by deliberate systemic violation of their beliefs and perceptions through deception, secrecy and betrayal. Joseph Goebbels, the herald of National Socialism, refined and summarized these strategies in proclaiming the “big lie” as an essential tool of a revolutionary government. First Impressions 2 People are limited by the scale of their perceptive framework. Tell a big enough lie and they won’t recognize it for what it is. Men will steer their perceptions to preserve their peace with things as they are for them. Men will embrace a convenient lie if by so doing they are comfortable. Men will choose to accept a lie into themselves if it conveys an emotional reward rooted in safety for the self. Those in the world’s authority have long relied on this devastating principle laid out in the infamous “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.” It is: “We teach others to believe as truth that which we, ourselves, know to be false.” It is a statement from those who live a lie. Where does this “knowing” come from, but Hell? The evidence in Bro. Stephen’s blogs presents a clear need for awareness that evil exists among us, not only alleged to exist in a principle suspect and a single category of sin (murder of innocence), but on a political level (cover up), and on a doctrinal level (authoritarianism based on men, fostering and men accepting blind following). The radiating spokes of this evil reach into every aspect of our spiritual life and development of our Celestial souls, and, if uncorrected, will deny our hope to return to the welcoming presence of the Father and the Son. (2 Nephi 28:21, 24-26) The ideal that the Lord laid out through Joseph was a hierarchy of responsibility and stewardship with authority over that stewardship, but also accountability. But just as with the Constitution of the United States, priesthood government cannot succeed without its participants being men of honor, integrity and commitment to the ideals of this faith. The priesthood was to be composed of men of the highest virtue, ever striving to perfect themselves. This striving was to make themselves in harmony with the law abiding nature of Jesus, and in harmony with his self-denying nature of servant leader. The two are inseparable, although men would have it otherwise. It is all too easy to lose track of the necessity to assume the virtues of the nature of the Savior and focus on that part of our gospel that declares for building one’s own kingdom in imitation of other patriarchs and holders of higher ordinances. Men tend to gravitate in favor of doing things that can be seen, rather than being good for goodness sake. In a way, the participants in priesthood organization at all levels need the accountability that should come from the church structure. Having the nature of a servant-leader is not achieved by saying that carrying out the functions of a calling fulfills this responsibility. Being a servant leader is an attitude that must characterize everything we do. It is to be a trait of personality. The school of the prophets is also the school of the saviors, or in time the mis-perception will divorce the participants from the mind and Spirit of God. You can't be where He is unless you are like-minded. Everything we do in daily life either strengthens us and makes of us closer in mind and spirit to Jesus, or retards us, or, in the case of sexual exploitation, makes in us a nature that is incompatible with being in the presence of the Savior. Our damnation is of our own doing. When we give an accounting of ourselves, it will be as though our natures and desires were laid open, without the ability to exercise the conceits and deceits the natural man uses. We are either preparing to be comfortable in the presence of one we have strived to be most like and thus know, or one whose penetrating judgment we fear, because we have pursued a path of estrangement and double-mindedness all along. I wonder if one of the requirements to be forgiven of gross sin expressed in D&C 132 is to have one’s higher ordinances performed with the approval of the Lord through the manifest sign of his energy upon one. Without that, is the ordinance complete in the fullest sense? Without that, is such a position of great trust valid and in force? Do we have the Lord’s indemnification if we didn’t have his approval to enter into the sacred ordinance in the first place? If this approving power be necessary, it follows that the one performing the ordinance and the one through which such ordinances be performed must be likewise approved by God, by the same sign. Bro. Owen’s surprising confession in (blog 6, p. 6 and blog 31) gives pause. Perhaps it really is a “distinction without a difference” as the LDS Mormons would say. But what if the Lord wants a man not only who is qualified, but has extra strength in virtue or a commitment to the truth, stronger than to be swayed by other men? What if the Lord knows when a man only appears to be qualified, but has some unfinished business? (This refers to those appointed through the sole agency of man to high office.) This is why it is so important that we know of ourselves where our leaders stand with God and have the question of worthiness confirmed, and not merely by hearsay assurances. What is of the Lord cannot be overthrown by man. What is of the Lord cannot be overthrown by truth. This is why the apparently bold assertions against Bro. Steve found in blog 8 are so pathetic. However, men can betray their trust and subvert law and justice and the other attributes of priesthood as upholders and protectors, and do it from within. Whatever man or group of men declare themselves to be above the law, or act above the law, they are thereby setting themselves above the lawgiver. This is blasphemy when the law is given by God and the men claim to hold God’s priesthood authority. Lawlessness is one of the attributes and prerogatives of whom? “And upon my house shall it begin . . . First among those among you, saith the Lord, who have professed to know my name and have not known me, and have blasphemed against me in the midst of my house, saith the Lord.” (D & C 112:25, 26) If there’s one difference between where we are and where a man of God like Rulon is, it’s that when he felt prompted by events, or heard the voice of the Lord, he went forward and pursued the matter to the end. He used the knowledge he had and applied it to doing the work of the Lord. He used the powers of priesthood he had in the correct way, as directed by the Holy Spirit. He took the Lord at his word. Why don’t we? If we’re going to have the power of the priesthood confirmed in us, we have to step up and claim it, and bear the burden of so doing. We all hold the same priesthood; it’s only a question of degree of responsibility and sphere of stewardship. We gain experience so we can be worthy of greater things.